How Much Impulse Is Needed to Stop a Baseball with Unrealistic Momentum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter slimyspacewit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
To stop a baseball with a momentum of 900 kg m/s, an impulse equal to that momentum is required, meaning the outfielder must apply an impulse of 900 Ns. Given a maximum force of 100 N, the time needed to exert this force can be calculated using the impulse-momentum theorem. However, the momentum value presented seems unrealistic, as it implies an extremely high velocity for a baseball, estimated between 3000 to 4500 m/s. This suggests a potential error in the initial momentum figure, as typical baseballs have a mass of about 0.2 to 0.3 kg. Clarifying the momentum value is essential for accurate calculations.
slimyspacewit
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If a baseball were flying towards an outfielder with a momentum of 900 kg m/s. What impulse would the outfielder need to apply to bring the ball to a stop? AND If the maximum force the dude can exert is 100N for what length of time will he have to exert this force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This sounds like a homework question.
Please post it in the homework forums and they can help you there.
 
I think there is something wrong with your number. I don't know the mass of a baseball but I would guess about 0.2 to 0.3 kg.
To have a momentum of 900 kg m/s means a velocity of 3000 to 4500 m/s and that does not sound reasonable
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top