How Much of a Glass Cube's Surface Must Be Covered to Hide a Central Spot?

AI Thread Summary
To hide a central spot in a glass cube from all viewing angles, specific parts of the cube's faces must be covered. The critical angle for total internal reflection must be calculated using Snell's law, with the refractive index of the glass being 1.50. A visual representation shows that rays from the spot must be blocked, particularly those that would refract through the cube's face. The area that needs to be covered corresponds to a circular region on the face of the cube, determined by the critical angle. Understanding these principles is essential for solving the problem effectively.
kreil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
665
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement



A glass cube has a small spot at its center. What parts of the cube face must be covered to prevent the spot from being seen, no matter what the direction of viewing? What fraction of the cube face must be covered? Assume a cube edge of 1 cm and a refractive index of 1.50. (Neglect subsequent behaviour of an internally reflected ray.)



Homework Equations



I think the only relevant equations are snells law and the critical angle equation:

n_1 sin( \theta_1)=n_2 sin( \theta_2)

\theta_c=\frac{n_2}{n_1},,,,(n_2<n_1)


The Attempt at a Solution



I have no clue how to even start this. I need some hints first.

-Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rays from the spot that do not suffer total internal reflection need to be blocked.

Draw a little square with a dot in the middle (a top view of the situation). All rays from the one straight towards the front of the cube up to first ray that will be refracted along the face of the cube (the "last ray") need to blocked off. This region will then form a circle on the side face. Notice that the incident angle of the "last ray" will be the critical incident angle.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top