How Much Torque Is Needed to Stop Rotating Balls in 6.97 Seconds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leeoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the torque required to stop a system of two balls connected by a rigid rod in a specified time frame. The system consists of a 3.15 kg ball and a 6.30 kg ball, rotating at 24.2 rpm. The correct torque to halt the rotation in 6.97 seconds is determined to be 1.31 N*m. Key equations include torque = I*alpha, where alpha represents angular acceleration, and the need to accurately calculate the center of mass (CM) for the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and torque
  • Familiarity with the concept of center of mass (CM)
  • Knowledge of angular velocity and angular acceleration
  • Ability to apply kinematic equations in rotational motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate the center of mass for systems with multiple masses
  • Study the relationship between angular velocity and angular acceleration
  • Explore the application of torque in real-world mechanical systems
  • Investigate the effects of varying mass distributions on rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and rotational motion, as well as engineers working with mechanical systems involving torque and angular dynamics.

Leeoku
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 3.15 kg ball and a 6.30 kg ball are connected by a 1.31 m long rigid, massless rod. The rod is rotating clockwise about its center of mass at 24.2 rpm. What torque will bring the balls to a halt in 6.97 s?
Answer: 1.31e+00 N*m


Homework Equations


torque = I*alpha


The Attempt at a Solution


Alpha = 24.2*2pi/60
= 2.53
Torque = I*alpha
= 2.53(3.15*(1.31/2)^2+6.3(1.31/2)^2)
= 10.3

Ok so i think my process is right but my Centre of mass is probably wrong. is this because of the different weighting of both sides? Now i know Centre of mass = mr^2, but how do know how far each contributes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing things up a bit.

In your first equation you use alpha to signify angular speed, but in the second equation it signifies time rate change of angular speed, that is, angular acceleration. Following the usual notation you should probably use omega for angular speed in the first equation and then alpha for angular acceleration. You also need one more equation that makes the kinematic relationship between omega and alpha as a function of time.

You are correct that your center of mass is wrong. From definition of the CM you need to find the position along the rod, xcm, where m1(xcm-x1) + m2(xcm-x2) = 0 with x values being distances with sign along the rod from some reference point. For instance, choosing the m1 end of the rod as reference you have x1 = 0 and x2 = length of rod and you can easily solve for xcm.
 
The centre of mass is where the rod would balance perfectly on the point of a pin. To achieve this the torques on each side must be equal. Torque = Force x Distance. So the distance to one of the balls (from the centre of mass), multipled by that weight, must equal the distance to the other ball (from the centre of mass), multiplied by that weight. Then remember those two distances must add up to the full length of the rod. Hope that helps.
 
got it! thanks for the explanation on CM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K