How Much Weight Can My Angle Bracket Rails Safely Hold?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the weight capacity of aluminum angle brackets (6063-T52) used for a server rack. The user seeks clarity on how much weight these brackets can safely hold, given their dimensions and mounting configuration. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) indicates that the brackets can support approximately 6 kg when the load is evenly distributed. Additionally, increasing the material thickness significantly reduces stress, suggesting a nonlinear relationship between thickness and weight capacity. Overall, the insights highlight the importance of proper calculations for load-bearing applications.
k2ace
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to make some simple rails for a makeshift server rack. I already have some aluminum angle (6063-T52) that has 2" legs and .125" thick. I have been trying to figure out how much weight could be safely held and can't find anything that makes sense. The weight load is fairly evenly distributed but from the from 15" deep. The weight will only sit on the outer 1.5"on the angle (the image incorrectly shows 3/4"). The angle is mounted at two points 17.25 inches between against 0.5" vertical rails. Is there some simple way to determine how much weight this might safely hold?
 

Attachments

  • bracket.png
    bracket.png
    12.2 KB · Views: 332
Engineering news on Phys.org
Classical beam bending formulas assume that load is distributed over the whole width of cross-section so they won’t work here. But I solved this for you using FEA. Simulation results indicate that the angles should be able to hold up to about 6 kg.
 
FEAnalyst said:
Classical beam bending formulas assume that load is distributed over the whole width of cross-section so they won’t work here. But I solved this for you using FEA. Simulation results indicate that the angles should be able to hold up to about 6 kg.
Thanks, I really appreciate the response. Is this sort of thing typically liner in respect to material thickness, if the thickness is increased by X percent would it increase the weight capacity by at least X percent?
 
In case of twice as thick angle the stresses are about 4 times lower.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top