How Much Will Mercury Rise in a Thermometer Due to Thermal Expansion?

NvZnPhysics
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. A mercury thermometer has a bulb of volume .100 cm^3 at 10degreesC. The capillary tube (initially empty) above the bulb has a cross-sectional area of .00012 cm^2. How much will the mercury rise when the temperature rises by 30degreesC? Ignore the thermal expansion of the glass bulb and tube. (beta of mercury = 1.8 x 10^-4 degreeC^-1)


Homework Equations


Q = mcdT
H = kAdT/L


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried plugging in numbers for H = kAdT/L and I'm not sure what the "beta of mercury" is. I'm pretty bad at thermo.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "beta of mercury" is the thermal expansion coefficient of mercury, which describes how much the liquid's volume changes with temperature.

Remember: If you are stuck trying to figure out what a given coefficient/constant is for, have a look at the units, here you have units of inverse temperature, so this coefficient MUST describe how something changes with respect to temperature.

Helpful... or do you need more guidance?
 
npupp said:
The "beta of mercury" is the thermal expansion coefficient of mercury, which describes how much the liquid's volume changes with temperature.

Remember: If you are stuck trying to figure out what a given coefficient/constant is for, have a look at the units, here you have units of inverse temperature, so this coefficient MUST describe how something changes with respect to temperature.

Helpful... or do you need more guidance?

Thank you so much
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top