How Much Work Does the Catapult Do on a Fighter Jet During Launch?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done by a catapult on a fighter jet during launch. The jet's engines provide a thrust of 230,000 N, and at lift-off, it has a kinetic energy of 45,000,000 J after moving 87 m. A participant initially concludes that the catapult does no work, reasoning that the work equals the final kinetic energy, which they assume is solely from the engines. However, others clarify that the catapult's contribution can be deduced by comparing the total energy to the energy provided by the engines alone, indicating that the catapult must indeed perform work to account for any excess energy. Understanding the relationship between engine work and total kinetic energy is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Cheddar
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A fight jet is launched from an aircraft carrier with the aid of its own engines and a steam-powered catapult. The thrust of its engines is 230,000 N. In being launched from rest it moves through a distance of 87 m and has a kinetic energy of 45,000,000 J at lift-off.
What is the work done on the jet by the catapult?


Homework Equations


Work = (Force * cos(angle)) * displacement
Work = Final Kinetic Energy - Initial Kinetic Energy


The Attempt at a Solution


My problem is that without the catapult's force, I can't do the first equation.
In using the 2nd equation, initial velocity = 0m/s, which causes the initial kinetic energy to be 0 N. If that is so, then Work = Final Kinetic Energy and the catapult does no work.
This one is driving me crazy...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cheddar said:
In using the 2nd equation, initial velocity = 0m/s, which causes the initial kinetic energy to be 0 N. If that is so, then Work = Final Kinetic Energy and the catapult does no work.
How did you deduce that the catapult does no work?

Hint: What's the total work done? How much work does the engine thrust account for?
 
Cheddar said:
If that is so, then Work = Final Kinetic Energy and the catapult does no work.
This one is driving me crazy...

Your conclusion that the catapult does no work does NOT follow from the statement that the work done is equal to the final kinetic energy (I fail to see what the latter has to do with the former).

Here is an idea of how your thought process should go. How much work is done by the jet's engines alone? Is this amount of energy consistent with the stated final energy? If not, did the jet have more energy or less energy than what you expected in the end? If it had more energy than expected, then clearly the extra energy must have come from something other than the engines.

So, in other words, you don't need to know the catapult's force on the jet, because you can DEDUCE how much work is done by the catapult by comparing the actual final energy to the final energy one would expect if the engines alone were doing the work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top