How Should a Quarterback Throw to Hit a Stationary Receiver?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a quarterback running parallel to the line of scrimmage and needing to throw a football to a stationary receiver downfield. The scenario includes considerations of relative motion and vector addition in a kinematics context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the vector sum of velocities and the need to determine the correct angle for the throw. There are questions about the accuracy of the diagrams representing the velocities and the relationships between them.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the diagrams, suggesting corrections to the direction of the velocity vectors. There is an ongoing exploration of how to accurately represent the problem and the relationships between the velocities involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with the constraints of the problem as stated, including the quarterback's speed and the throw's relative speed, while also addressing the need for clarity in vector representation.

Natko
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A quarterback is running across the field, parallel to the line of scrimmage, at a constant speed of 2.5m/s, when he spots an open, stationary receiver straight downfield from him (ie, in a line parallel to the sidelines). If he can throw the football at a speed of 8.0m/s, relative to himself, at what angle, relative to the sidelines, must he throw it in order to hit the receiver? How far downfield was the receiver?


Homework Equations


Pythagorean theorem
SOH CAH TOA


The Attempt at a Solution


IMG_0282.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your diagram performs the vector sum of two velocities at right angles. You sum two velocity vectors if one of them represents a velocity relative to the other. But the relative velocity is not given here - it's the thing you are trying to find.
See if you can get the right diagram.
 
Does this look better?
IMG_0288.jpg

Sorry, it's flipped on PF even though I rotated it on my computer.
 
Natko said:
Does this look better?
Yes, except that the arrow on the 8m/s goes the wrong way. When adding vectors diagrammatically, the contributing vectors connect nose-to-tail; the resultant runs from the tail of the first to the nose of the last.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
7K