How Should I Calculate Rotational Energy Levels of NH3?

_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
I'm supposed to calculate the rotational energy levels of NH3, which is a symmetric rotator. The rotational energy levels are determined by the equation

EJK = hcBJ(J+1) + hc(A-B)K^2, where J = 0, 1, 2,..., and K = 0, +/-1, +/-2,..., +/-J

I don't quite get it. Are there a very limited set of rotational energy levels for NH3 that makes it practically possible for me to calculate each one of them, or should I calculate only the, say, first four possible levels? I've looked around for clues in my textbook, but I can't see that there are any.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With no upper limit on J there are infinitely many energy levels. This is similar to the energy levels of electrons in an atiom. Start at the bottom and work your way up.
 
I had already solved it myself before you responded, but thanks anyway! I'll probably need more help in the future.
 
Oh, I guess I should make it clear if I no longer need help with a problem I've asked for help solving. It's certainly not OK for me to waste your time. My apologies!
 
_Andreas said:
Oh, I guess I should make it clear if I no longer need help with a problem I've asked for help solving. It's certainly not OK for me to waste your time. My apologies!
It would be good of you to do that. Not a problem here since I did not do much work and needed a bit of review anyway.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top