How Strong is the Gravitational Pull Between Tom and Sally?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational attraction between Tom and Sally, given their masses and distance apart. The formula F = G(m1*m2/d^2) is suggested for the calculation, but participants question the relevance of the gravitational force in a real-world context. It is noted that the gravitational pull between two people is negligible compared to the Earth's gravitational force, making it unlikely for Sally to feel Tom's attraction. Additionally, there is debate about the phrasing of the question, suggesting it is more about the romantic notion of attraction rather than a scientific inquiry. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the absurdity of applying physics to everyday human interactions.
kimikims
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
anyone know how to do this problem??

Tom has a mass of 65.7 kg and Sally has a
mass of 52.9 kg. Tom and Sally are standing 28.7 m apart on a massless dance foor. Sally looks up and she sees Tom. She feels an attraction. If the attraction is gravitation, find its magnitude. Assume both can be replaced by spherical masses and that G=6.67259 x 10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2.
Answer in units of N.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use

F = G\frac{m_{1}m_{2}}{d^2}
 
So... would this be correct?

F= 6.67259 x 10^-11 [(65.7kg)(52.9kg) / (28.7)^2)]
 
kimikims said:
anyone know how to do this problem??

Tom has a mass of 65.7 kg and Sally has a
mass of 52.9 kg. Tom and Sally are standing 28.7 m apart on a massless dance foor. Sally looks up and she sees Tom. She feels an attraction. If the attraction is gravitation, find its magnitude. Assume both can be replaced by spherical masses and that G=6.67259 x 10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2.
Answer in units of N.

This question is phrased weird. If they are both standing on the dance floor, then she will not see Tom by looking up unless there's a mirror on the ceiling, which would be irrelivant to the problem anyway.

She feels an attraction. If the attraction is gravitation, find its magnitude.
This should be 9.81 m/s^2 in the down direction. Despite the massless floor, the Earth that the massless floor is on is still pulling with a magnitude of 9.81 m/s^2.

She will definitely feel the Earth's attraction. As far as the gravity exerted by Tom's mass, she definitely will not feel this attraction. The most sensitive equipment on Earth would not be able to detect Tom's presence by his gravity field, so Sally certainly can't feel Tom's gravitational attraction. This implies you don't have to compute anything.
 
No silly...she feels some attraction, not her own weight! We all feel our weight all the time, and we don't classify it as anything out of the ordinary. So why would she suddenly start paying attention to it? The question implies that she feels some gravitational attraction other than her attraction to the Earth (her weight). They want you to compute her gravitational attraction to Tom, just to drive home the point that everything made up of matter in the universe is gravitationally attracted to everything else, but the effects in everyday situations (such as between people) are miniscule. Yeah ok, so she would never actually be able to feel said attraction, but you're being too literal...get into the spirit of the question! Didn't you ever get these silly problems in high school..."ooh, I think there's some "attraction" between Tom and Sally...can you compute its magnitude?", says the physics teacher with a ridiculous grin on his face, thinking himself terribly witty. :rolleyes:

As for the looking up part, they don't mean "straight up"! The question is trying to be melodramatic...she was glancing down distracted for a second (for whatever reason), and when she looked up again, there he was.

A more important question comes from this phrase: "If the attraction is gravitation, find its magnitude." What if it isn't? I think there's actually some chemistry going on here... :wink:
 
Last edited:
"As for the looking up part, they don't mean "straight up"! The question is trying to be melodramatic...she was glancing down distracted for a second (for whatever reason), and when she looked up again, there he was."
Isn't the usual sequence:
Suddenly catches sight of TOM, flustered, looks down, then helplessly, is drawn to look at him again??:confused:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top