How the components of the wave vector k are quantized?

Mrinmoy Naskar
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Please Use the Homework Template
for a electron in a cubic box ( dimension of the box is L) problem how to show the components of the wave vector k are quantized...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mrinmoy Naskar said:
for a electron in a cubic box ( dimension of the box is L) problem how to show the components of the wave vector k are quantized...

Should this be in the homework section?

What forces k to be quantized is boundary conditions. There are two different boundary conditions that are typically used with such a box:
  1. \psi(\vec{r}) = 0 whenever \vec{r} is on the boundary of the box. This is equivalent to assuming that the box is embedded in infinite space, but there is a potential energy V(\vec{r}) with V(\vec{r}) = 0 inside the box and V(\vec{r}) = \infty outside the box.
  2. \psi(\vec{r}) = \psi(\vec{r} + L \hat{i}) = \psi(\vec{r} + L \hat{j}) = \psi(\vec{r} + L \hat{k}), where \hat{i}, \hat{j}, \hat{k} are unit normal vectors to the three sides of the box. This is called "periodic boundary conditions".
The first boundary condition leads to the conclusion that \psi(x,y,z) = \sum_{n,l,m} C_{n,l,m} sin(k_n x) sin(k_l y) sin(k_m z) where k_n = \frac{\pi n}{L} (and similarly for k_l and k_m)

The second boundary condition leads to the conclusion that \psi(x,y,z) = \sum_{n,l,m} C_{n,l,m} e^{i k_n x + k_l y + k_m z} where k_n = \frac{2\pi n}{L} (and similarly for k_l and k_m)
 
  • Like
Likes Mrinmoy Naskar
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top