How to Apply the Hamiltonian to a Wavefunction in Quantum Electromagnetism?

frogjg2003
Messages
263
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a charged particle of charge e traveling in the electromagnetic
potentials
<br /> \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t) = -\mathbf{\nabla}\lambda(\mathbf{r},t)\\<br /> \phi(\mathbf{r},t) = \frac{1}{c} \frac{\partial \lambda(\mathbf{r},t)}{\partial t}<br />
where \lambda(\mathbf{r},t) is an arbitrary scalar function.

Show that the wavefunction is
<br /> \psi(\mathbf{r},t) = exp\left(-\frac{\mathit{i}e}{\hbar c} \lambda(\mathbf{r},t)\right) \psi^{(0)}(\mathbf{r},t)<br />
where \phi^{(0)}(\mathbf{r},t) is the solution to the Schrodinger equation for the case \lambda(\mathbf{r},t)=0.
of ¸(r, t) = 0.

Homework Equations



\hat{H} = \frac{(\mathbf{p}-\frac{q}{c}\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r},t))^2}{2m} + q\phi(\mathbf{r},t)

The Attempt at a Solution



The Hamiltonian is
<br /> \hat{H} = \frac{(\mathit{i}\hbar\mathbf{\nabla} + \frac{e}{c}\mathbf{\nabla}\lambda(\mathbf{r},t))^2}{2m} + \frac{e}{c} \frac{\partial\lambda(\mathbf{r},t)}{\partial t}<br />
and the \lambda=0 wavefunction is
<br /> \psi^{(0)} = exp(\mathit{i} \left(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r} - \frac{\hbar k^2 t}{2m}\right)<br />

I'm stuck at applying the Hamiltonian to the function. For the \nabla^2\lambda\psi term, do we apply the Laplacian to just \lambda or to \lambda\psi? Similarly for the cross term and the time derivative.

Is it
<br /> \hat{H}\psi = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2\psi + \frac{\mathit{i}e\hbar}{2mc} \left(\nabla\cdot(\psi\nabla\lambda) + (\nabla\lambda)\cdot(\nabla\psi)\right) + \frac{e}{2mc}\psi\nabla^2\lambda + \frac{e}{c} \psi\frac{\partial\lambda}{\partial t}<br />
or
<br /> \hat{H}\psi = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2\psi + \frac{\mathit{i}e\hbar}{2mc} \left(\nabla^2(\psi\lambda) + (\nabla\lambda\cdot\nabla)\psi\right) + \frac{e}{2mc}\nabla^2(\lambda\psi) + \frac{e}{c} \frac{\partial(\lambda\psi)}{\partial t}<br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
frogjg2003 said:
The Hamiltonian is
<br /> \hat{H} = \frac{(\mathit{i}\hbar\mathbf{\nabla} + \frac{e}{c}\mathbf{\nabla}\lambda(\mathbf{r},t))^2}{2m} + \frac{e}{c} \frac{\partial\lambda(\mathbf{r},t)}{\partial t}<br />
and the \lambda=0 wavefunction is
<br /> \psi^{(0)} = exp(\mathit{i} \left(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r} - \frac{\hbar k^2 t}{2m}\right)<br />
Note typo: In the first term of the Hamiltonian, there should be a negative sign before the ##\mathit{i}\hbar##
I'm stuck at applying the Hamiltonian to the function. For the \nabla^2\lambda\psi term, do we apply the Laplacian to just \lambda or to \lambda\psi? Similarly for the cross term and the time derivative.

Is it
<br /> \hat{H}\psi = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2\psi + \frac{\mathit{i}e\hbar}{2mc} \left(\nabla\cdot(\psi\nabla\lambda) + (\nabla\lambda)\cdot(\nabla\psi)\right) + \frac{e}{2mc}\psi\nabla^2\lambda + \frac{e}{c} \psi\frac{\partial\lambda}{\partial t}<br />
or
<br /> \hat{H}\psi = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2\psi + \frac{\mathit{i}e\hbar}{2mc} \left(\nabla^2(\psi\lambda) + (\nabla\lambda\cdot\nabla)\psi\right) + \frac{e}{2mc}\nabla^2(\lambda\psi) + \frac{e}{c} \frac{\partial(\lambda\psi)}{\partial t}<br />

It's the first form that's correct (with a negative sign for the second term). However, it's much easier to apply the hamiltonian in the form
<br /> \hat{H} = \frac{(\mathit{-i}\hbar\mathbf{\nabla} + \frac{e}{c}\mathbf{\nabla}\lambda(\mathbf{r},t))({-i}\hbar\mathbf{\nabla} + \frac{e}{c}\mathbf{\nabla}\lambda(\mathbf{r},t))}{2m} + \frac{e}{c} \frac{\partial\lambda(\mathbf{r},t)}{\partial t}<br />

where you first apply the right hand factor ##(\mathit{-i}\hbar\mathbf{\nabla} + \frac{e}{c}\mathbf{\nabla}\lambda(\mathbf{r},t))## to the wave function and simplify before applying the second factor of ##(\mathit{-i}\hbar\mathbf{\nabla} + \frac{e}{c}\mathbf{\nabla}\lambda(\mathbf{r},t))##.
 
Thanks.
I was doing a bit too much work. I didn't need to know the form of \psi^{(0)}, just that it solved the free particle Schrodinger equation. From there, I just applied the Hamiltonian and started simplifying. I got the original free particle Shodinger equation right back.
 
Good deal.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top