How to Approach Oscillations Homework Problems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around tackling oscillations homework problems, specifically involving complex equations with multiple cosine terms. A user expresses difficulty in simplifying their approach, leading to messy calculations. Other participants suggest sharing full calculations for better assistance and recommend ignoring higher powers of variables A and ε. They also advise expressing cos(3ωt) in terms of cos(ωt) and cos(3ωt) without using sine functions. A clearer strategy is needed to simplify the problem effectively.
prinnori
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I attached a file containing the problem statement, because it is impossible to reproduce all the symbols.

Homework Equations



Also in the attached file.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to simply substitute theta but it turned out to be very messy...
 

Attachments

  • Oscillations.png
    Oscillations.png
    28 KB · Views: 518
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi prinnori! welcome to pf! :wink:
prinnori said:
I tried to simply substitute theta but it turned out to be very messy...

show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong, and we'll know how to help! :smile:
 


θ(t)= A ( cos ωt + ε cos 3ωt );
d²θ/dt² = -ω² A (cos ωt + 9ε cos 3ωt);
θ³(t) = A³ ( cos³ωt + 3ε cos²ωt cos 3ωt + 3ε² cos ωt cos²3ωt + ε³ cos³ 3ωt ) =
= ... =
= A³/4 [ 3cos ωt (2ε²+ε+1) + cos 3ωt (3ε²+6ε+1) + 3cos 5ωt (ε²+ε) + 3ε² cos 7ωt + ε³ cos 9ωt]

Replacing all this in the equation won't help... I need a different approach but I can't think of anything else...
 
hi prinnori! :smile:

i] you can ignore higher powers of A and ε

ii] you need to express cos3ωt in terms of cosωt and cos3ωt (and no sin) :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top