How to Approach Transverse Movement of N Masses?

mahler1
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement .

Consider the system of ##N## masses shown in the figure (see picture 1).

a) Using the approximation for small angles, write the equation of transverse movement for the n-th particle.

b) Propose a solution of the form:
##{ψ_n}^{p}(t)=A^{p}\cos(nk^{p}+α^{p})cos(w^{p}t+\phi^{p})## (##p## is in parenthesis in the original statement but I couldn't write it correctly here). Find the dispersion relation and decide whether it depends on the contour conditions.

The attempt at a solution.

For part a), I am making the assumption that ##x_n-x_{n-1}=d##, ##l_0## and ##k## are the natural length and spring constant for all the springs and ##m## is the mass of all the particles. Taking these things into consideration, the equation for the ##n##-th mass is (see picture 2)

(1)##\hat{y})## ##m\ddot{y_n}=-k(a_n-l_0)\sinθ_n+k(a_{n+1}-l_0)\sin_{n+1}##, with

##a_n=\sqrt{(y_n-y_{n-1})^2-d^2}##, ##a_{n+1}=\sqrt{(y_{n+1}-y_n)^2+d^2}##. Now, for small oscillations, I can approximate ##a_n## and ##a_{n+1}## by ##d##, i.e., ##a_n≈d≈a_{n+1}##

so (1) reduces to

(2) ##\hat{y})## ##\ddot{y_n}=-\dfrac{k}{m}(d-l_0)\dfrac{y_n-y_{n-1}}{d}+\dfrac{k}{m}(d-l_0)\dfrac{y_{n+1}-y_n}{d}##

if I call ##{w_0}^2=\dfrac{k}{m}\dfrac{d-l_0}{d}##, then the equation (2) equals to

(3) ##\ddot{y_n}={w_0}^2(y_{n+1}-2y_n+y_{n-1})##

I would like to know if I've done correctly part a). With regard to part b), I don't understand the notation of the proposed solution, to be more specific, I don't understand what ##p## is, is it an index? Could someone explain me what ##\ddot{y_n}## would be just to see what ##p## stands by?

Sorry if this isn't the adequate section for my thread, I didn't know whether to put it here or in another section.
 

Attachments

  • picture 1.jpg
    picture 1.jpg
    6.4 KB · Views: 453
  • picture 2.jpg
    picture 2.jpg
    3.3 KB · Views: 424
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello mahler1. Your equation of motion looks good to me.

The problem wants you to find solutions of your equation of motion in the particular form given in the statement of the problem. These types of solutions are called "normal modes". In a normal mode each particle oscillates with the same frequency ##\omega^{(p)}## but the individual particles will have amplitudes that differ from one particle to the next. Each normal mode is like a "standing wave". In solving the problem, you will see that more than one normal mode is possible. The index ##(p)## denotes a particular normal mode: ##p = 1,2,...##. You will discover how many normal modes there are and what their frequencies are.

##\psi_n^{(p)}(t)## is just another notation for your ##y_n(t)##. That is, it represents the displacement of the nth particle as a function of time for the ##p^{th}## normal mode.

So, see if you can make the given form satisfy your equation of motion. You will need to think about the boundary conditions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
TSny said:
Hello mahler1. Your equation of motion looks good to me.

The problem wants you to find solutions of your equation of motion in the particular form given in the statement of the problem. These types of solutions are called "normal modes". In a normal mode each particle oscillates with the same frequency ##\omega^{(p)}## but the individual particles will have amplitudes that differ from one particle to the next. Each normal mode is like a "standing wave". In solving the problem, you will see that more than one normal mode is possible. The index ##(p)## denotes a particular normal mode: ##p = 1,2,...##. You will discover how many normal modes there are and what their frequencies are.

##\psi_n^{(p)}(t)## is just another notation for your ##y_n(t)##. That is, it represents the displacement of the nth particle as a function of time for the ##p^{th}## normal mode.

So, see if you can make the given form satisfy your equation of motion. You will need to think about the boundary conditions.

Very clear answer, thanks. I've supposed that the two extremes are fixed, i.e., ##y_0(t)=0=y_{N+1}(t)##.

##y_{N+1}(t)=0## if and only if ##0=A^{(p)}\cos((N+1)k^{(p)}+α^{(p)})\cos(\phi^{(p)})##. From here, I could set ##\phi^{(p)}=\dfrac{\pi}{2}##.

Now, using that ##y_0(t)=0## and that ##\phi^{(p)}=\dfrac{\pi}{2}##, I get that ##0=0=A^{(p)}\cos(α^{(p)})\cos(\dfrac{\pi}{2})##, so I would also conclude that ##α^{(p)}=\dfrac{\pi}{2}##.

As you've said, I am going to have ##N## different frequencies corresponding to each normal mode. I am having trouble to find the form of each ##\omega^{(p)}##, I think I must use equation (3) but I don't know how to. Could you help me with that?
 
mahler1 said:
I've supposed that the two extremes are fixed, i.e., ##y_0(t)=0=y_{N+1}(t)##.

OK. Good. Note that these boundary conditions must be satisfied at all times t, not just t = 0. If you think about it, the phase constant ##\phi^{(p)}## determines the phase of the normal mode vibration at time ##t = 0##. But there is no restriction on this initial phase. So, you will not be able to determine a value of ##\phi^{(p)}##.

I suggest starting with the boundary condition at n = 0. Make sure this condition holds at all times t.

Then move on to the boundary condition at n = N+1.

Finally, invoke your equation (3).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top