How to Calculate Charge Density Inside a Nucleus Using Gauss's Law?

Anti-Meson
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a model of an atomic nucleus, the electric field is given by:

E = α r for r < a

where α is a constant and a is the radius of the nucleus.


Use the differential form of Gauss's Law to calculate the charge density ρ inside the nucleus.


2. The attempt at a solution

Using the simple version of Gauss's law :

\int_{S} \underline{E}.\underline{dS} = \int_{V} \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}} dV

Yields a result \rho = \frac{3E\epsilon_{0}}{r} for 0<r<=a

Homework Statement



However when using the differential form:

\nabla . \underline{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}}

\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial (r E_{r})}{\partial r} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}}

and when integrating with respect to r from 0 to a,

\rho = {\epsilon_{0}} E (1 + ln a )


Any helpful advice would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you accidently used the cylindrical version of the divergence.

Why are you integrating?
 
turin said:
I think you accidently used the cylindrical version of the divergence.

Why are you integrating?

I have used the cylindrical version, though this problem only depends on r so maybe use spherical? I integrated the partial differential with respect to r.

if I assume that Er is not a function of r but a constant then,

\frac{\partial (r E_{r})}{\partial r} = E_{r}

or if i use a radial divergence from the beginning:

\nabla . E = \frac{\partial (E)}{\partial r}

but by using that I get:

E = \frac{\rho r}{\epsilon_0}

i.e missing a factor of 3
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top