How to Calculate Ground Run Distance for a Cessna 172?

Reazar3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am trying to work out the ground run distance of takeoff for an aircraft. I can't really write the formula down because of the length and many variations of it so I am just hoping that you know what I am talking about.

I am trying to work it out for a cessna 172 so i am expecting a distance around 250m for the ground run. At the moment i am getting 105m which is definitely wrong compared to the existing data on 172s. I've tried several different formulae but they all give me the same problem.

I suspect that it could be the fact that thrust is needed in the equation and the cessna is measured in hp however i converted it to force using F=P/V and used that in my calculations. I've checked my workings countless times but i just don't know what's wrong.

I am in a bit of a hurry so if you want to know the variables and equations i can send them to you via email.

Thanks,
Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reazar3 said:
I suspect that it could be the fact that thrust is needed in the equation and the cessna is measured in hp however i converted it to force using F=P/V and used that in my calculations. I've checked my workings countless times but i just don't know what's wrong.
From the miniscule fragment of information that you have given, I suspect that this is your problem. The hp that you're using, is that at the engine, or is that delivered to the aircraft? It can be quite complicated to determine hp delivered to the aircraft is all you know is the hp produced by the engine(s). The typical aircraft propulsion is gaseous thrust, either by propeller deflecting air molecules or by hot gas exhaust. The hp of the engine may have little to do with this. If it is prop driven, then you need the speed and geometry of the propeller. (And then I guess ignore hp of engine altogether). If it is jet driven, then you need the speed and rate of exhaust gas. (And, again, I guess ignore hp of engine).

Note that the amount of runway required for take off is lower-limited by the hp of the engine (among other factors, and assuming no tail wind). So, what you've calculated, I believe, essentially amounts to a theoretical lower limit on the length of the runway if you were somehow able to harness 100% of the power produced by the engine into pushing the aircraft. I suppose that is an interesting number.
 
Yea i know it wasnt much information but i have done like 10+ pages of calculations hence why i said if you need it id email it to you. Anyway, i have figured it out now, it was the thrust value, i ended up using an ESDU document on how to estimate thrust for light prop aircraft and the new thrust value it gave me was half of what i had before. :)
 
post the equations youve been given please.
direct integration seems too messy esp with so many functions involved, so i think your'e using a program (matlab/fortran) right?
i did a project on a similar problem so i think i may be able to help you but i need the info given to solve it
 
How do we calculate the lift coefficient during ground run and landing. Ground run and landing includes the airborne distance.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top