I How to calculate increasing force

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fizzics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Increasing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a 'T' bar frame with balanced weights on pulleys and the impact of pulling down one weight. It is noted that any non-zero force will disrupt the equilibrium, leading to acceleration. To calculate the force required to pull down one weight, additional information is necessary, particularly the acceleration of the weights. If the weights are moved at a constant velocity, the force required is zero, assuming no friction is present. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate calculations in this scenario.
Fizzics
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
We have a 'T' bar shaped frame with a pulley wheel at each end then a wire passing across the pulleys with a 10 kg weight attached to each end making each side perfectly balanced.
If we were to physically pull down the weight on one side thus upsetting the balance against gravity, could the force used to do this be calculated in an equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fizzics said:
If we were to physically pull down the weight on one side thus upsetting the balance against gravity, could the force used to do this be calculated in an equation?
Ignoring friction, any non zero force will upset the equilibrium.
A single smote of dust on one side means the forces no longer cancel and acceleration will occur.
 
Fizzics said:
We have a 'T' bar shaped frame with a pulley wheel at each end then a wire passing across the pulleys with a 10 kg weight attached to each end making each side perfectly balanced.
If we were to physically pull down the weight on one side thus upsetting the balance against gravity, could the force used to do this be calculated in an equation?

Not without further information. Specifically you need to know how fast you accelerate the weights. If you move them at constant velocity the required force is zero (assuming there is no friction).
 
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top