How to calculate large DC motor efficiency?

AI Thread Summary
Two primary methods for calculating large DC motor efficiency are experimental and analytical approaches. The analytical method involves recording motor nameplate values, calculating the electrical power for the shunt field and armature, and dividing the mechanical output power by the total electrical power. An example calculation shows that a 400 HP motor yields an efficiency of 93.8%. The experimental method requires a dynamometer to measure output shaft power while recording armature and field voltage and current. Additionally, both Swinburne’s Test and Hopkinson’s Test can be utilized, with Hopkinson's Test providing greater accuracy due to its use of two identical machines.
Ana Mido
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
What are the two methods for calculating large DC motor efficiency ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Experimentally and analytically.
 
  • Like
Likes Asymptotic and PhysicoRaj
billy_joule said:
Experimentally and analytically.
In detail, please.
 
For a reasonable estimate at full power rating:
  • Record motor nameplate values.
  • Calculate electrical power required by the shunt field, and armature power. Add them together.
  • Divide mechanical output (shaft) power into the electrical power required to generate it.
Example: 400 HP. 1750 RPM. 500V/633A armature. 300V/4.84A shunt field.
316.5 kW + 1452 watts = 317.952 kW
400 HP = 298.28 kW
298.28/317.95 = 93.8%

Experimentally, design and build a suitably sized dynamometer (or haul the motor to a rewind shop large enough to have the requisite equipment), and couple it to the motor. Measure output shaft power while simultaneously measuring and recording armature and field voltage and current. Do the math.
 
  • Like
Likes Ana Mido and billy_joule
Asymptotic said:
For a reasonable estimate at full power rating:
  • Record motor nameplate values.
  • Calculate electrical power required by the shunt field, and armature power. Add them together.
  • Divide mechanical output (shaft) power into the electrical power required to generate it.
Example: 400 HP. 1750 RPM. 500V/633A armature. 300V/4.84A shunt field.
316.5 kW + 1452 watts = 317.952 kW
400 HP = 298.28 kW
298.28/317.95 = 93.8%

Experimentally, design and build a suitably sized dynamometer (or haul the motor to a rewind shop large enough to have the requisite equipment), and couple it to the motor. Measure output shaft power while simultaneously measuring and recording armature and field voltage and current. Do the math.
What about Swinburne’s Test and Hopkinson’s Test ?. Can they be used for calculating large Machine efficiency?
 
Ana Mido said:
What about Swinburne’s Test and Hopkinson’s Test ?. Can they be used for calculating large Machine efficiency?

Sure.
To do a Hopkinson you need two identical DC machines, but it's more accurate than a Swinburne (which is run no-load, and doesn't account for several significant effects).
 
  • Like
Likes Ana Mido
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top