How to Calculate Magnetic Flux with a Long Wire and Rotated Plane

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the magnetic flux through a rotated plane defined by specific boundaries, the integral of the magnetic field B over the surface area is required, represented as ∫_S B · n dA, where n is the unit normal vector. The geometry of the problem involves a long wire carrying a current of 2.50 A along the z-axis, with the plane at an angle of π/4. The magnetic field generated by the wire decreases inversely with the radial distance r, as per Ampère's law. Participants in the discussion express confusion about the geometry and how to apply the flux definition correctly, particularly regarding the angle between the magnetic field and the surface. Clarification on the geometry and the role of the angle theta is sought to better understand the problem.
hd28cw
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Find the magnetic flux crossing the portion of the plane
theta = x/4 defined by 0.01 m < r <0.05 m and 0 m < z < 2 m. A current of 2.50 A is flowing along z-axis along a very long wire.

in drawing the picture i know that there is a long thin wire with a current of 2.5 amps flowing positively on the z-axis and the plane is lying rotated at an angle of pi/4 with the magnetic field flowing in a counter clockwise direction.

How do I go about finding the magnetic flux.
Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnetic flux through the surface is the integral

\int_S \vec B \cdot \hat n dA

where \hat n is a unit vector normal to the element of area dA.

From your description I don't have a clear picture of the geometry.
 
Tide said:
The magnetic flux through the surface is the integral

\int_S \vec B \cdot \hat n dA

where \hat n is a unit vector normal to the element of area dA.

From your description I don't have a clear picture of the geometry.
Me neither.I saw this problem 2 hours ago,but i couldnt' figure out the geometry and how would flux definiton and Ampère's law fit in.Let's hope (for his sake) he comes up with a drawing or with the original text.

EDIT:Maybe i got it.He's obviously using cylindrical coordinates and that domain should be a rectangle perpendicular to the OXY plane with one of the sides lying in the OXY plane.So i guess,be should find that,since magnetic field lines are perpendicular to the rectangle,the angle between the magnetic field and \vec<n should be zero.At constant z,the field is varying inversly proportional with "r" as stated by Ampèere's law.So the surface integral would splin in 2,the integral along the "z" gives the magnitude of "z" and along "r" smth about natural logarithm.
I guess that does it.Yet where does the XY angle "theta" come in...??Or am i missing something??Like a different from pi over 2 angle between teh field and the rectangle??Anyway...Tide,i let u give your opinion.
 
Last edited:
Dexter,

That makes sense. I think I'll wait for hd28cw to offer clarification!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top