How to Calculate Mass of Binary Star Systems Using Kepler's Law and Iteration?

quasarLie
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to calculate the mass of an astrometric binaries with P=10 years, and a1=15mas, parallax w=64mas
the luminosity is neglected

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


i used this equation:
M_1 + M_2 = \frac{(a/w)^3}{p^2}<br />
but the problem is taht i don't have M1
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect when the problem asks you to calculate the mass, they mean the total mass of the system, i.e. M1+M2.
 
No finally, i think that i have to use q =M2/M1= a1/a2 replace in the equation but then i will get a 3 dgree equation which i have to solve it with iterative methode (i don't know how yet)
 
quasarLie said:
No finally, i think that i have to use q =M2/M1= a1/a2 replace in the equation but then i will get a 3 dgree equation which i have to solve it with iterative methode (i don't know how yet)

How will you know a1 and a2?
 
I have a1 i will use Kepler law, it will become
\frac{a_1}{p^2}= M_1\frac{q^3}{(1+q)^2} w^3
the resolution will give a 3rd degree equation which can be solved using:
q_i = (1+q_{i-1})^{2/3} q_0
Until it converge but i don't know how to use this part (to solve this equation with iteration)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top