How to calculate the energy lost in a projectile from drag?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the energy lost in a projectile due to drag, recognize that drag force is proportional to velocity, which varies during the projectile's ascent. The energy lost can be determined by multiplying the drag force by the distance traveled. For a projectile shot straight upwards, the potential energy difference between the maximum heights with and without drag can be used to quantify energy loss. Simulations often break the motion into small time steps to calculate velocity and drag force at each point. If the projectile is a sphere, orientation does not impact calculations, but for other shapes, aerodynamic forces must also be considered.
Necm
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The force of drag is proportional to velocity, but with a projectile velocity isn't constant, so how could i calculate the energy lost due to drag?
The projectile in question is being shot straight upwards, so that may make this problem much more simple.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this an actual experiment, where you will be measuring things like velocity, or is it a theoretical exercise where you will be given values for certain quantities?
 
Necm said:
The force of drag is proportional to velocity, but with a projectile velocity isn't constant, so how could i calculate the energy lost due to drag?
The projectile in question is being shot straight upwards, so that may make this problem much more simple.
Well, the energy lost is force times distance and the force of drag is a square function of velocity. You should be able to put that together (with, in this case, gravity) to find the energy loss due to drag.
 
You could use the potential energy difference corresponding to the maximum height you'd expect without drag and the maximum height with drag.
 
These problems are usually simulated in small time steps. At each time step, the object velocity and orientation is known and the resultant drag force is calculated. If the object is a sphere, you don't have to worry about its orientation. Otherwise, you need to also calculate aerodynamic rotational forces and keep track at each step of its orientation and resultant coefficient of drag.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top