How to Calculate Time in Air for a Trebuchet Projectile?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time a trebuchet projectile spends in the air, it's essential to consider both vertical and horizontal components of the initial velocity. The projectile's maximum height was correctly calculated at different angles, but the time of flight requires using the vertical component of the initial velocity, which is found by multiplying the initial speed by the sine of the launch angle. The formula V = u + at should apply to the vertical motion, using the vertical initial velocity instead of the total initial speed. Acknowledging this distinction allows for accurate calculations of time spent in the air, which is crucial for determining the projectile's range. Understanding the separation of vertical and horizontal motion is key to solving projectile motion problems effectively.
Marghk
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm looking at trebuchets. Basically, a trebuchet shoots a projectile with an initial velocity of 30ms-1 at an angle of 55, 65 and 75 degrees. Friction/Wind resistance do not account.

I need to find the maximum height reached, the time the projectile spends in the air and the range. I am having troubles with the time spent in air, therefore affecting my last calculation.

I got a maximum height of 30.811m at 55 degrees.
37.71m at 65 degrees.
42.842m at 75 degrees.


Homework Equations



As mentioned, I'm having trouble finding the total time spent in air. I know I have he following variables. I know that the time to reach max height x2 is the time of flight.

Y = Verticle, X = Horizontal

Uy= 30ms-1
Vy = 0ms-1 (Obviously no movement at the exact highest point)
a= -9.8ms-2
Sy = 30.811m


I tried using the rule V = u+at

V=u+at
T=(v-u)/a

This gives me (0-30)/-9.8
Giving me 3.06 seconds and a total time of 6.122 seconds.


The Attempt at a Solution



If I wanted to use that equation to find out the time taken if launched at 65 and 75 degrees, I would get the same answer due to the fact that verticle displacement isn't accounted.

I've been going over this again and again and I can't figure out anything.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well actually there is movement at the highest point.
It has vertical and horizontal speed. The vertical speed is zero at the highest point, but the horizontal speed is constant.
You said that "Y = Verticle, X = Horizontal", but you never seem to notice the horizontal.
When the angle is 55 for example, it has a vertical and a horizontal component.
Vy = sin 55 * v
Vx = cos 55 * v
So Uy is not 30ms-1.
I think you can solve it now.

EDIT: I just noticed that the values for maximum height are correct. So that's what you did (used vertical and horizontal components).
But then why are you using 30 m/s for (0-30)/-9.8 ? Shouldn't it still be sin 55 * 30?
You are only doing calculations vertically.
The acceleration only acts vertically, the final speed is zero only vertically, so then why use the resultant speed in the formula. You have to use the initial vertical speed as well.
 
Last edited:
husky88 said:
You are only doing calculations vertically.

Thanks, I just realized I wasn't calculating both horizontal and vertical attributes. Can't believe I missed that!

Thanks again :D
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top