How to Calculate V3 or Q3 in a Capacitance Network?

hectoryx
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A capacitance matrix represents the charge coupling within a group of conductors — that is, the relationship between charges and voltages for the conductors. Given the three conductors shown in the following link, with the outside boundary taken as a reference,

http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af335/hectoryx/capacitancenetwork.jpg


Homework Equations



the net charge on each object will be:

$\begin{array}{l}<br /> {Q_1} = {C_{10}}{V_1} + {C_{12}}({V_1} - {V_2}) + {C_{13}}({V_1} - {V_3}) \\ <br /> {Q_2} = {C_{20}}{V_2} + {C_{12}}({V_2} - {V_1}) + {C_{23}}({V_2} - {V_3}) \\ <br /> {Q_3} = {C_{30}}{V_3} + {C_{13}}({V_3} - {V_1}) + {C_{23}}({V_3} - {V_2}) \\ <br /> \end{array}$<br />


The Attempt at a Solution




The problem is, if all of the capacitances are already known, and {V_1} - {V_2} = U is also known, but {V_1} and {V_2} is not known.

then how to calculate {V_3} or {Q_3}?

Thanks in advance.

Regards

Hector
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't believe that it is possible. You have six unknowns, but only four equations. Do you know any other values besides just V1-V2? Two more independent values should do it.
 
Thanks for your reply.

However, in the equivalent circuit of the capacitor network, the voltage of conductor 3 to the reference ground can be caculated...so...
 
hectoryx said:
... in the equivalent circuit of the capacitor network, the voltage of conductor 3 to the reference ground can be caculated ...
Are you suggesting that this is possible if you only know V1-V2? I don't believe so. If you simply mean that, yes, there is this additional input information, then the solution is trivial: V3=V3, right? I must not be understanding your problem.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top