How to Correctly Approach Partial Fraction Decomposition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kai92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Partial
AI Thread Summary
To correctly approach partial fraction decomposition for the expression (x^3+4)/((x^2-1)(x^2+3x+2)), it is essential to factor the denominator accurately. The decomposition should include terms for repeated factors, such as A/(x - r_1) + B/(x - r_2) + C/(x - r_2)^2 + D/(x - r_3). After expanding, a system of equations can be derived by equating coefficients from both sides. This method will help in finding the values for A, B, C, and D. Properly addressing the repeated factors is crucial for a successful solution.
kai92
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(x^3+4)/((x^2-1)(x^2+3x+2))

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Try separating them into Ax+B and Cx+D, then expand until
(A+C)x3+(3A+B+D)x2+(2A+3B-C)x+(2B-D)
then, I was stuck. I can't find any value for A,B,C or D. Is my attempt correct or is there other way to solve it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at your expansion. What must A+C equal to match the original numerator? Follow this line of reasoning for the other factors. You will wind up with a system of equations to solve.
 
kai92 said:

Homework Statement


(x^3+4)/((x^2-1)(x^2+3x+2))


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Try separating them into Ax+B and Cx+D, then expand until
(A+C)x3+(3A+B+D)x2+(2A+3B-C)x+(2B-D)
then, I was stuck. I can't find any value for A,B,C or D. Is my attempt correct or is there other way to solve it?

Did you factor the denominator? It's not clear to me from your work that you did. The right side should look something like this:
$$ \frac{A}{x - r_1} + \frac{B}{x - r_2} + \frac{C}{(x - r_2)^2} + \frac{D}{x - r_3}$$
The reason for the 3rd term above is that there is a repeated factor that is shared by the two quadratics in the denominator.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top