How to Derive Beam Deflection Formula for a Double Cantilever Simple Beam?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the beam deflection formula for a double cantilever simple beam. The original poster has the formula y = (FL^3)/(48—Iε) but is unsure how to connect it with other equations like M ymax / I and 1/p = M/EI. Respondents question the validity of the provided formula and suggest that the poster clarify whether they are looking for the derivation of d^2y/dx^2 = M/EI. They also recommend considering the two beams as springs in parallel or series to determine the effective spring constant. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in the formulas and the correct approach to the derivation.
***ALLI***
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


hi i am currently trying to mathcamatically derive the beam deflection formula for a double cantilever simple beam. i have the beam deflection formula y= (FL^3)/(48—Iε) as well as M ymax / I as well as 1/p = M/EI but am not sure how to link them together. any help will be apprecieated
Thanx :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
***ALLI*** said:

Homework Statement


hi i am currently trying to mathcamatically derive the beam deflection formula for a double cantilever simple beam What's that? Do you mean a beam on two simple supports?[/color] i have the beam deflection formula y= (FL^3)/(48—Iε)what's this? It looks something like the deflection at centerline of a simply supported beam with a concentrated load F at its center, but your denominator makes no sense. [/color] as well as? = [/color] M ymax / I as well as 1/p = M/EI but am not sure how to link them together. any help will be apprecieated
Thanx :)
See my questions noted in red. Are you looking for the derivation of the beam deflection formula d^2y/dx^2 = M/EI ? You might want to google it.
 
you definitely need to consier the two beams as springs in parallel or series, then get the effective spring constant
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top