How to derive the coefficient of thermal expansion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the relationship between Young's Modulus and the coefficient of linear thermal expansion, highlighting their inverse proportionality. It begins by explaining how to calculate strain from thermal expansion using basic principles and formulas. The derivation involves substituting the change in length due to thermal expansion into the Young's Modulus equation. The final conclusion is that Young's Modulus is inversely proportional to the coefficient of linear thermal expansion, confirming the initial claim. A solid understanding of the relevant formulas is essential for this derivation.
tony_engin
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi!
How to relate the Young's Modulus with the coefficient of linear thermal expansion? It is known that they are inversely proportional to each other, but how to prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

It can be derived from basic principles. You can start by finding the strain caused by
the thermal expansion. The change in length for this part can be found by subbing in the thermal expansion formuale. Hence we have found the strain.

Y=stress/strain
=Fl/A(dl) where dl= change in length
I cannot proceed further than this due to lack of information on which kind of shape it have. ( to calculate A) However, the coefficient of thermal expansion could be seen to be inversely proportional to Y after subbing in the expression for dl.
 
Ok...For this you need to have a good grip on basic formulae

Since you are dealing with linear Young's modulus.First of all Young's Modulus for a wire of a specific material is given by:

Y= \frac{FL}{A (dL)}

where dL=Change in Length

Now change is length due to linear expansion is given by:

dL=L (a) (dT)

a=coefficient of linear expansion
dT=Change in Temperature

Now putting the values in Young's modulus equation:

Y= \frac{F}{A (a) (dT)}

Therefore Y is inversely proportional to a...easy isn't it?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top