How to Determine Reactions at Points in Beam Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
To determine reactions at points A and C in beam analysis, it is essential to start by applying equilibrium equations, as there are three equations available for three unknowns. The discussion clarifies that member CD, being pinned at both ends and free of internal transverse loads, behaves as a truss member, which influences the direction of the reaction at C. It is noted that while pin connections typically have unknown reaction directions, specific conditions can define them more clearly. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately drawing shear and bending moment diagrams for beam AB. Proper application of these concepts will lead to a successful analysis of the beam.
zzinfinity
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Neglecting the size of the pulley at G, draw the shear and bending moment diagrams for beam AB.



Homework Equations


Fxnet=0
Fynet=0
Netmoment=0


The Attempt at a Solution

\

What I want to do first is figure out the reactions at A and C, however I'm not sure how to do that since there seem to be four unknowns and only three equations. Is this the correct first step, or should I try it another way? Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • pic.jpg
    pic.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 481
Physics news on Phys.org
zzinfinity: Yes, that is the correct first step. No, there are three equations and three unknowns. Hint 1: Is member CD a so-called truss (axial force) member? Give it a try.
 
So does that mean the reaction at c is in the direction of cd? I thought pin connections always had a reaction with unknown direction. Is this not always the case?
 
Since member CD is apparently pinned at both ends, the reaction at C will be in line with the line segment CD.
 
zzinfinity said:
So does that mean the reaction at c is in the direction of cd?
Yes.
zzinfinity said:
I thought pin connections always had a reaction with unknown direction. Is this not always the case?
zzinfinity: You are correct. Pin connections generally have a reaction force with (initially) unknown direction. However, this is not the case if a member is (1) pinned at both ends, and (2) has no internal transverse applied load. (Notice, there is no load applied to member CD between points C and D. It thus meets both conditions 1 and 2, making it a truss member.)

Meeting condition 1, alone, does not define a truss (axial force) member.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
708
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top