How to Determine the Force on a Conducting Plane Due to Two Point Charges?

NullSpace0
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the force on an infinite conducting plane due to two point charges: a +2q located at a height 4h above the plane and a -q charge located at a height 2h above the plane, directly beneath the other point charge.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that due to Newton's 3rd Law, I can just calculate the force on a single charge (due to an image charge symmetrically below the plane) and the negative of this force is the force on the plane. Does this method extend to 2 charges?

Then I would think that I place a -2q charge at -4h, and a +q charge at -2h, and then calculate the two forces on the real charges due to the 3 other charges present... then the opposite of that force is the force ON the plane?

Can you add the forces like that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NullSpace0 said:
Then I would think that I place a -2q charge at -4h, and a +q charge at -2h, and then calculate the two forces on the real charges due to the 3 other charges present... then the opposite of that force is the force ON the plane?

Can you add the forces like that?

Yes, I think that is correct. However, you don't need to include the force of one real charge on the other real charge, just the force of each image charge on each real charge.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top