How to develop a Parabolic Velocity Profile in 3D tube/channel flow

AI Thread Summary
To develop a Parabolic Velocity Profile in 3D tube/channel flow, the discussion highlights that the 2D equation used for parallel plates cannot be directly applied. The relevant flow in a circular tube is identified as Poiseuille flow, characterized by a parabolic velocity profile. The equation for this flow is given as u_z = (1/4μ)(dp/dz)(r^2 - R^2), where u_z is the flow velocity, μ is dynamic viscosity, r is the distance from the centerline, and R is the inner radius of the tube. An alternative expression for the axial velocity in terms of mean velocity is also provided: u_z = 2u_m(1 - (r/R)^2). Understanding these equations is crucial for accurately modeling 3D flow dynamics in tubes.
ksbiefr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i am trying to develop a Parabolic Velocity Profile in 3D tube/channel flow. for the 2D case i use

u = 1.5*Um *(1-(2y/H)^2)
where

Um= fluid velocity
y = position of solid on "y" axis (x,y)
H = width of channel
The above equation is not possible to used for 3D case (x,y,z). i try to search for 3D case not i am not successful.

Any body suggest me a equation/formula for developing Parabolic Velocity Profile in 3D tube/channel flow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your post is a little confusing. By 2D are you referring to flow between parallel plates, and by 3D are you referring to axial flow in a duct of circular cross section?

Chet
 
Are you familiar with how the equation you used was derived? If so, you can easily derive the equation for the velocity profile in a circular tube for a steady, fully-developed, laminar flow with constant pressure gradient. It is still parabolic. The flow is called Poiseuille flow. I won't go through the derivation, but here is the velocity profile for a circular tube:
u_z = \dfrac{1}{4\mu}\dfrac{dp}{dz}(r^2 -R^2).

Here, ##u_z## is the flow velocity, ##\mu## is the dynamic viscosity, ##r## is the distance from the centerline, ##R## is the inner radius of the tube, and ##dp/dz## is the pressure gradient through the tube.
 
boneh3ad said:
Are you familiar with how the equation you used was derived? If so, you can easily derive the equation for the velocity profile in a circular tube for a steady, fully-developed, laminar flow with constant pressure gradient. It is still parabolic. The flow is called Poiseuille flow. I won't go through the derivation, but here is the velocity profile for a circular tube:
u_z = \dfrac{1}{4\mu}\dfrac{dp}{dz}(r^2 -R^2).

Here, ##u_z## is the flow velocity, ##\mu## is the dynamic viscosity, ##r## is the distance from the centerline, ##R## is the inner radius of the tube, and ##dp/dz## is the pressure gradient through the tube.
To expand on what boneh3ad has said, that axial velocity can also be expressed in the same form as your "2D" equation (in terms of the mean velocity) by writing:

##u_z=2u_m\left(1-(\frac{r}{R})^2\right)##

Chet
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top