How to differentiate a term with respect to metric

the_doors
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


for example: ##\frac{\partial(F^{ab}F_{ab})}{ \partial g^{ab}} ## where F_{ab} is electromagnetic tensor.
or ##\frac{\partial N_{a}}{\partial g^{ab}}## where ##N_{a}(x^{b}) ## is a vector field.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


i saw people write ##F^{ab}F_{ab}## as ## g^{ca}g^{db}F_{cd} F_{ab}## and say we write the term in a way that exposes the dependence on the metric. but exactly what it means ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to write your function in terms of the variables you have, in your case ##g^{ab}## and ##F_{ab}##. The contravariant ##F^{ab}## is not independent of those and so will have non zero partial derivatives wrt both. Writing it in terms of your variables let's you differentiate easier.

As a similar example: Take ##f(x,y) = xy##. The partial derivative ##\partial_yf## is simply ##\partial_y (xy) = x##. This is essentially the same. Do not be confused by the fact that you use the same letter to denote the covariant and contravariant tensors.
 
for example if ##N_{\mu}(x^\nu)## be unit time like dynamical four velocity, what's happening ? i don't know explicit form of ##N_{\mu}##.
 
ok we can write for first example:##\frac {\partial (g^{ca}g^{db}F_{cd}F_{ab})}{\partial g^{ef}}## = ##\frac{\partial g^{ca}}{\partial g^{ef}}g^{db}F_{cd}F_{ab}+\frac{\partial g^{db}}{\partial g^{ef}}g^{ca}F_{cd}F_{ab}+\frac{\partial F_{cd}}{\partial g^{ef}}g^{ca}g^{db}F_{ab}+\frac{\partial F_{ab}}{\partial g^{ef}}g^{ca}g^{db}F_{cd}## . is it correct ?

##\frac{\partial g^{ca}}{\partial g^{ef}}=\delta^c_{e} \delta^a_{f}## is it correct ?

what's happening for ## \frac{\partial F_{cd}}{\partial g^{ef}}## ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top