How to differentiate this potential energy function?

AI Thread Summary
To differentiate the potential energy function V(x,y)=V(ax-by) with respect to x and y, the chain rule is applied, leading to the derivatives (d/dt)p1=-aV'(ax-by) and (d/dt)p2=+bV'(ax-by). The confusion arises from the negative sign in the first derivative, which is attributed to the structure of the potential energy function itself. The variables p1 and p2 represent the x and y components of Newton's second law, indicating the relationship between force and potential energy. Understanding the application of the chain rule and the negative sign in the Lagrangian formulation clarifies the derivation process. This discussion highlights the importance of multivariable calculus in analyzing potential energy functions.
diredragon
Messages
321
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Given the potential energy function V(x,y)=V(ax-by) where a,b is an arbitrary constants differentiate with respect to x and y.

Homework Equations


Multivariavle differentiation

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer yields (d/dt)p1=-aV'(ax-by)
(d/dt)p2=+bV'(ax-by). The right side is confusing. How did it get to that? I am not in my MultiCal class yet as I am just in the middle of SingCal so i don't get it. Can you guide through the process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming ## z=ax-by ## and using chain rule, we have:
## \frac{dV}{dx}=\frac{dV}{dz}\frac{dz}{dx}=a\frac{dV}{dz}##. Now we change the name of ## \frac{dV}{dz} ## to ## V'##.
 
Ok, but why is it -aV'?
 
At first I didn't know what are p1 and p2 and what are those equations, but I thought you yourself know! Anyway, I think those are the x and y components of Newton's 2nd law and so they are components of ## \frac{d\vec p}{dt}=-[\frac{dV}{dx}\hat x+\frac{dV}{dy}\hat y]##. The extra minus sign is because of the minus sign in the formula itself.
 
Oh yes, i know what the equations are but have totally forgotten about the minus in front of the right side of lagrangian. Thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top