How to evaluate pure Mode-II SIF using Abaqus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sagar Thakre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Abaqus Pure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on evaluating pure Mode-II Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) using Abaqus for an edge normal crack in a plate. The user reports discrepancies between Abaqus results and theoretical SIF values, attributing the issue to boundary conditions and element selection. The recommended approach includes selecting appropriate elements, such as the 2D CPS8R, and ensuring proper meshing techniques. Additionally, consulting fracture mechanics literature is advised to address challenges in modeling near crack tips.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stress Intensity Factors (SIF) in fracture mechanics
  • Familiarity with Abaqus software, specifically version used for finite element analysis
  • Knowledge of finite element meshing techniques
  • Experience with boundary condition setup in finite element models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research proper meshing techniques for crack modeling in Abaqus
  • Study the selection criteria for finite elements, particularly 2D CPS8R elements
  • Explore fracture mechanics literature, focusing on Mode-II SIF analysis
  • Review Abaqus example problems related to crack analysis for practical insights
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students, engineers, and researchers involved in fracture mechanics and finite element analysis, particularly those working with Abaqus for crack evaluation.

Sagar Thakre
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am trying to evaluate pure Mode-II SIF using Abaqus for edge normal crack in the plate. The solution i am getting using Abaqus is not matching with the theoretical SIF.
The boundary condition i have used is shown in fig attached.
suggest me proper boundary condition to evaluate the SIF.
 

Attachments

  • Boundary condition.JPG
    Boundary condition.JPG
    6 KB · Views: 527
Engineering news on Phys.org
The last time I used Abaqus, it came with a thick book of example problems. I'm sure that at least one of those problems analyzed a crack.

The boundary conditions that you show are quite simple. The crack itself is not so simple. It is likely that your solution not matching is related to your selection of element and/or how you meshed your model.

As a master's student, your task is to figure out how to properly model this problem. You need to select the element, and justify your selection. Then you need to mesh your model properly, and justify that also. And you will need to convince your advisor.
 
jrmichler said:
The last time I used Abaqus, it came with a thick book of example problems. I'm sure that at least one of those problems analyzed a crack.

The boundary conditions that you show are quite simple. The crack itself is not so simple. It is likely that your solution not matching is related to your selection of element and/or how you meshed your model.

As a master's student, your task is to figure out how to properly model this problem. You need to select the element, and justify your selection. Then you need to mesh your model properly, and justify that also. And you will need to convince your advisor.
Thanks for your reply.
I have solved problem for Pure Mode-I on same plate and there is close agreement between theoretical and Abaqus results. I have used 2D CPS8R element in solving this problem.
but it is not working in case of Mode-II SIF.
 
Time to hit the fracture mechanics books. I did a quick search with search terms fracture mode 2 fea, and this popped up: http://www.mate.tue.nl/~piet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsyl1213.pdf. It discusses some of the challenges in modelling near a crack tip, and provides some references that appear to apply to your specific problem. Search forward from those sources, and you should find answers to your case.
 
jrmichler said:
Time to hit the fracture mechanics books. I did a quick search with search terms fracture mode 2 fea, and this popped up: http://www.mate.tue.nl/~piet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsyl1213.pdf. It discusses some of the challenges in modelling near a crack tip, and provides some references that appear to apply to your specific problem. Search forward from those sources, and you should find answers to your case.
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
10K