How to Expand Noncommuting Variables in a Formal Power Series?

fuchini
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Need to show that [a,f(a,a^\dagger]=\frac{\partial f}{\partial a^\dagger}

Homework Equations


[a,a^\dagger]=1

The Attempt at a Solution


Need to expand f(a,a^\dagger) in a formal power series. However I don´t know how to do it if the variables don´t commute.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##f(a,a^+)= b_0+ b_1 a+b_2 a^+ b_3 a^2 +b_4 aa^+ +b_5 a^+a+b_6 (a^+)^2+\ldots##
So the general term is some product of a and ##a^+## in arbitrary order.
 
Thanks for answering, but how would it be in terms of derivatives? Normally It would be:

f=\sum_{m,n} \frac{a^m a^{\dagger m}}{n!m!}\frac{\partial^{n+m} f}{\partial a^n \partial a^{\dagger m}}

But in this case I guess I have to take into account that they're noncommuting.
 
Start with a simpler case, i.e., ##f = (a^\dagger)^n## only. Use induction (on ##n##) to show that the desired formula holds. Once you understand the induction method for this problem, you'll probably work it out for more general ##f## more easily.
 
Thanks, that did the trick!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top