MHB How to Express a Force as a Sum of Parallel and Perpendicular Components?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
Click For Summary
To express the force vector $2i+j$ as a sum of components parallel and perpendicular to the movement direction $i+j$, one must project the force vector onto the velocity vector. The parallel component is calculated using the projection formula, which involves the dot product of the force and velocity vectors divided by the square of the velocity's magnitude. The perpendicular component can be determined by subtracting the parallel component from the original force vector. This method allows for a clear separation of the force into its directional influences relative to the object's movement. Understanding these projections is essential for analyzing forces in physics.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

We suppose that a force that is given by the vector $2i+j$ is applied at an object that moves at the direction $i+j$.
How can we express this force as a sum of a force that has the direction of the movement and a force that is perpendicular to the direction of the movement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

We suppose that a force that is given by the vector $2i+j$ is applied at an object that moves at the direction $i+j$.
How can we express this force as a sum of a force that has the direction of the movement and a force that is perpendicular to the direction of the movement?

Hi evinda! (Smile)

We project the force vector onto the velocity vector to find the parallel component.
And onto a normal of the velocity vector to find the perpendicular component.

Such a projection is given by:
$$\boldsymbol\pi_{\mathbf v}(\mathbf F) = \frac{\mathbf F \cdot \mathbf v}{{\|\mathbf v\|}^2} \mathbf v$$
(Thinking)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
750
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
474