How to Find a Specific Transformation for a Specific Hamiltonian?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cosmossos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformations
Cosmossos
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question 3b from the following file:
http://phstudy.technion.ac.il/~wn114101/hw/wn2010_hw07.pdf

I know I need to find a generating function for this spacific transformation. but I don't know how to find it, I mean , how I find a spacific transformation for a spacific hamiltonain?
thnaks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what the Hamiltonian of a one dimensional harmonic oscillator looks like?
 
It's the classic expression (H=p^2/2m+kx^2/2)
 
Cosmossos said:
It's the classic expression (H=p^2/2m+kx^2/2)

Right, so (using P and Q instead of 'p' and 'x'), you are looking for a canonical transformation Q=Q(q,p) and P=P(q,p), for which \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{q^2}+p^2q^4\right)\to \frac{P^2}{2m}+\frac{kQ^2}{2}[/itex] (give or take a constant)...what does the fact that the transformation is canonical tell you?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top