Calculating Angular Momentum: Converting Units and Solving for Mass and Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating angular momentum using the formula kg*m/s*m, with a specific example of a train's mass and velocity. The calculation resulted in an angular momentum of 1.877 x 10^9 kg*m^2/s, which participants agree appears correct. There is a concern about potential issues with rounding affecting marks received. Additionally, ambiguity regarding the direction of the train's movement and the point's position relative to the track is noted as a possible source of confusion. Ultimately, the direction of the angular momentum vector was confirmed to be correct.
Sneakatone
Messages
318
Reaction score
0
I used kg*m/s*m

so 1500 metric tons=1500000 kg
85 km/h=23.61 m/s

( 1500000 )*23.61*53=1.877x10^9 kg*m^2/s

I feel like this is correct.
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2013-04-16 at 6.19.21 PM.png
    Screen shot 2013-04-16 at 6.19.21 PM.png
    34.5 KB · Views: 563
Physics news on Phys.org
1.877 x 10^9 kg*m^2/s looks right. Perhaps there's an issue with your rounding of the answer.
 
I agree with you. Maybe because you rounded down, they didn't give the mark? The one other thing that it might be, is that they don't actually say which direction the train is moving in. They just say where the point is in relation to the track. The natural assumption is to do as you did, and assume they mean that if the point is 'to the left' of the train, then that means someone who is facing forward on the train will see the point on their left. But there is an ambiguity here. Maybe they took it to be the other way around.
 
I origionally put 1.8 instead of 1.877 but your right, thanks!
 
BruceW said:
I agree with you. Maybe because you rounded down, they didn't give the mark? The one other thing that it might be, is that they don't actually say which direction the train is moving in. They just say where the point is in relation to the track. The natural assumption is to do as you did, and assume they mean that if the point is 'to the left' of the train, then that means someone who is facing forward on the train will see the point on their left. But there is an ambiguity here. Maybe they took it to be the other way around.

The direction "upwards" for the angular momentum vector was marked correct, so it looks like the assumption panned out.
 
oh yeah. good, good.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top