How to find the electric field coming from a sphere WITHOUT using Gauss' law?

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field above the center of a charged spherical shell without using Gauss' law, one must integrate over the surface of the sphere, focusing on the z-component due to symmetry. The charge element is represented as dq = σdA, where dA points radially from the sphere. A coordinate system is essential for expressing the radial component of the electric field based on the distance to the charge. Utilizing symmetry can simplify the integration process from two dimensions to one. The shell theorem suggests that if the charge is symmetrically distributed, it can be treated as a point charge outside the sphere.
anban
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How do I find the electric field at a point above the center of a charged sphere? Assume the sphere is a shell.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

\

I know there will only be a z component to the electric field, because x and y components will cancel by symmetry. I think the process will have to involve integrating over the surface of the sphere. Where do I start?

More things I know (or think I know):
dq = σdA
The dA terms will point radially from the sphere.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the process will have to involve integrating over the surface of the sphere. Where do I start?
With a coordinate system, and with an expression for the radial component of the electric field as function of the distance to your charge.
You can use symmetry to reduce the two-dimensional integral to a one-dimensional integral quickly.
 
Can you use shell theorem to just treat it as a point charge, as long as the charge is symmetrically distributed?
 
That would be the result of Gauß' law ;).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top