How to Find the Lagrangian for a Simple Pendulum with Moving Support?

Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
Find the Lagrangian for a simple pendulum of mass m whose point of support moves uniformly on a vertical circle with constant frequency \omega in a uniform gravitational field.

Let 'l' be the length of the pendulum string. Using plane polar coordinates:
Let T be the KE of the pendulum.
T = {1\over 2}m \left(\dot {r}^2 + r^2\dot{\theta}^2\right)
Let V be the PE.
V = -mgr\cos \theta
r = l = constant
I am wondering how to add the angular velocity \omega to the equation of motion. Need help here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how is omega related to theta?
 
Reshma said:
Find the Lagrangian for a simple pendulum of mass m whose point of support moves uniformly on a vertical circle with constant frequency \omega in a uniform gravitational field.

Let 'l' be the length of the pendulum string. Using plane polar coordinates:
Let T be the KE of the pendulum.
T = {1\over 2}m \left(\dot {r}^2 + r^2\dot{\theta}^2\right)
Let V be the PE.
V = -mgr\cos \theta
r = l = constant
I am wondering how to add the angular velocity \omega to the equation of motion. Need help here.
As with your other problem, You need to pick a pair of coordinates. A pair of angles looks good here also.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top