How to Find the Waist of a Gaussian Beam at the Focus Using a Lens?

Nanxie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, I'm really confused about this one, =(
Suppose I have a guassian beam that is colliminated (beam expanded) and then suppose i let it passed through a lens to focus it.

Given an initial waist and focal length of the lens. How can i find the waist (or half width) at the focus?

Homework Equations



a9bf8aaee5363251de92ac36daffef3d.png

a3a76eb12dd62a821aa8c00723c30cdc.png


The Attempt at a Solution



There's an approximation using the formula above

w(z)=(lambda*z)/(pi*w0)

where w0 is the waist at focus and z is the distance from it, so if i let z=f i can solve for w0
but this only works if z >> pi(w0)/lambda

how about for the case when z is small (or the focal length is small), i can't seem to solve it using the above equations.

Thanks~ ^^;
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF! :smile:

Sorry about the late reply, don't know how I missed your question earlier.

There's another equation for the angle of a Gaussian beam, given it's wavelength and waist size (at the focus). You can use that, as long as the focal length is much much longer than ZR -- and you can verify if that's true after you have found wo at the focus.

EDIT: Oh, I see you want a more general result, one that does not assume f>>ZR . Hang on while I check in my old Lasers textbook ... I'll post back soon

EDIT #2: Okay. What you want is to look up the "q parameter" for Gaussian beams, and how ABCD matrices can be used in calculating Gaussian beam propagation. Do you have a textbook that discusses these in detail?
 
Last edited:
looked up the 'q parameter' and you're right~
Just need the Matrix ABCD to calculate the beam parameters at any z.

thank you! ^^
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top