How to interpret quotient rings of gaussian integers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on interpreting the quotient ring of Gaussian integers, specifically the structure of Z[i]/<3>, where <3> is the ideal generated by the integer 3. Participants confirm that the elements of this quotient ring are isomorphic to the integers mod 3 adjoined with the imaginary unit i, denoted as \mathbb{Z}_3[i]. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how to represent cosets within this framework and clarifies the relationship between the ideal and the resulting quotient structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian integers (Z[i])
  • Familiarity with ideals in ring theory
  • Knowledge of quotient rings and their properties
  • Basic concepts of modular arithmetic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ideals in ring theory
  • Learn about isomorphisms in algebraic structures
  • Explore the concept of cosets in more detail
  • Investigate the application of quotient rings in number theory
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, number theory, or anyone interested in the properties of Gaussian integers and their quotient structures.

nateHI
Messages
145
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



This is just a small part of a larger question and is quite simple really. It's just that I want to confirm my understanding before moving on.

What are some of the elements of Z<i>/I</i> where I is an ideal generated by a non-zero non-unit integer. For the sake of argument, let's take I=<3>.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Representatives from one coset would be the following...
(8+4i)/<3>=(5+i)/<3>=(2+i)\in Z<i>/&lt;3&gt;</i>

Representatives from another coset would be the following...
(7+5i)/<3>=(4+2i)/<3>=(1+2i)\in Z<i>/&lt;3&gt;</i>
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At first glance I think it would be \mathbb{Z}_3. Can you try to prove this?
 
http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/ugradnumthy/Zinotes.pdf

I found the answer in that link on page 17. You are correct the elements are isomorphic to the integers mod 3 adjoin i. I just didn't understand that the quotient ring I was trying to produce the elements of was the (integers adjoin i) mod the generator of the ideal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K