How to measure copper sulfate specific heat

Thread starter Ipos Manger
Start date Oct 1, 2012
Tags

Copper Heat Measure Specific Specific heat

AI Thread Summary

To measure the specific heat capacity of a copper sulfate solution, one can use the equation q = mcΔT, where q is the heat absorbed or released, m is the mass of the solution, c is the specific heat capacity, and ΔT is the change in temperature. The experiment involves heating or cooling the solution and measuring the temperature change accurately. It is essential to ensure that the mass of the solution is known and that the heat transfer is effectively measured. The discussion emphasizes the need to isolate the variable 'c' and suggests focusing on how to quantify the other parameters involved in the equation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for successfully conducting the experiment.

Oct 1, 2012

Ipos Manger

Homework Statement

I was wondering, how can i measure the specific heat capacity of a solution? Not the exercise, just doing an experimental work to measure it.

Homework Equations

q=mct

The Attempt at a Solution

I'm lost.

Physics news on Phys.org

Oct 1, 2012

Borek

Mentor

Solve the equation for c and think how you can measure quantities that you have on the right side.

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »