How to Model a Magnet Falling Through a Solenoid

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on modeling a magnet falling through a solenoid, emphasizing the complexities involved in applying classical electromagnetism principles. The conversation highlights the point dipole approximation as a useful model, while also acknowledging its limitations compared to more sophisticated models like the homogeneous magnetization cylinder. Participants reference specific articles and threads, including insights from @kuruman and contributions from @hutchphd and @bob012345, which provide valuable context and additional resources for understanding the electromagnetic force (EMF) generated during this phenomenon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical electromagnetism principles
  • Familiarity with the point dipole approximation
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetic induction and EMF calculations
  • Experience with mathematical modeling in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of the EMF for a magnet falling through a solenoid
  • Explore the differences between point dipole and homogeneous magnetization models
  • Study the implications of magnetic surface currents in magnetostatics
  • Examine the article "A magnetostatics problem of interest" for further insights
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in electromagnetism, particularly those focusing on experimental setups involving magnets and solenoids.

kuruman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
15,877
Reaction score
9,045
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345, Charles Link, vanhees71 and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Great article for an experiment that is relatively simple to setup and perform, however it has a not so simple detailed explanation using the laws of classical electromagnetism.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
Delta2 said:
Great article for an experiment that is relatively simple to setup and perform, however it has a not so simple detailed explanation using the laws of classical electromagnetism.
When you say "not so simple", what specifically are you referring to? The math or the physics? Both, I think, are appropriate to the undergraduate intermediate level.
 
kuruman said:
When you say "not so simple", what specifically are you referring to? The math or the physics? Both, I think, are appropriate to the undergraduate intermediate level.
Yes I agree they are appropriate for undergraduate level, it's just that they are not so simple as for e.g. the emf of a rotating ring in a uniform B. The expressions look a bit complex, main responsible for this is the form of the B- field from a point dipole.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345, kuruman, Delta2 and 1 other person
Charles Link said:
Very good article @kuruman :). Besides the thread by @billyt_ mentioned in the above article, it may also be of interest to see posts 122-123 and 138-139 of https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/calculating-magnetic-field-strength-of-a-magnet.1005917/page-4
@hutchphd and @bob012345 had very good inputs in helping to solve the problem of the EMF of a magnet moving through a ring.
Thank you for liking the article and for pointing out this other thread. Part of my motivation for this article was to consolidate in one place what can be said about magnets falling through a single ring and a solenoid assuming the point dipole approximation. My hope is that it can serve as a reference for future questions and as a starting point for more complicated magnet points.

I should mention (advertise?) that I am now putting the finishing touches on a companion article that is intended to serve the same purpose but for a magnet falling through a solid conducting pipe. It should be ready in a few days.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345, vanhees71, Charles Link and 1 other person
You can also complete the article by actually describe the motion of the magnet itself. It's nicely described, e.g., in

https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2203645

He is using a different model for the magnet, i.e., a cylinder of homogeneous magnetization, which has been demonstrated to be a quantitatively better model for the experiment with a real bar magnet than the dipole approximation:

https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4864278
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
With this topic, (of the permanent magnet), perhaps it would even be useful for some readers to read come of the fundamentals. See
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...by-magnetic-surface-currents-comments.900528/
and
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/a-magnetostatics-problem-of-interest-2.971045/

When I was in college, (many years ago), we were taught the pole method, but it is important to connect that method to the magnetic surface current method, because otherwise, it is a lot of incomplete handwaving, where you have static fictitious charges creating a magnetic field. Fortunately, as it turns out, the pole method follows from the magnetic surface current method, and the two get the exact same answer for the magnetic field.

( I don't want to steer the reader away from the problem of the permanent magnet falling through the solenoid, but it is kind of important to have complete physics for the permanent magnet, in order to work this problem).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
vanhees71 said:
He is using a different model for the magnet, i.e., a cylinder of homogeneous magnetization, which has been demonstrated to be a quantitatively better model for the experiment with a real bar magnet than the dipole approximation:

https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4864278
Yes, I agree that the permanently magnetized disk model produces a better quantitative model if one has the data on one hand and the sophisticated analysis on the other. Like I said, the point dipole as a model is as useful and as accurate as the point mass is in mechanics.

My goal with these articles is modest: to show, at the intermediate undergraduate level, that the point dipole model goes a long way towards understanding what is physically going on with a magnet falling through a solenoid and a pipe. It's not perfect, but it does a descent job and any refinements to the model for a magnet are not going to change the basic features of the point dipole model. A secondary goal is to gather these ideas all in one place as an easily accessible reference for PF users who have questions related to this material.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Delta2
  • #10
See https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/drop-height-of-a-magnet-vs-induced-emf-in-a-solenoid.1014918/ (thread by @billyt_ )
posts 25 and 39. I think the transition from point magnetic dipole to an extended permanent magnet is fairly straightforward, because we are taking ## d \Phi /dt ## to compute the EMF, and thereby the integral (## d \Phi/dt ## rather than ## \Phi ##) over the length of the solenoid becomes routine. The magnetic dipole is also a very good calculation, but if we can do a finite length permanent magnet in closed form, that is even somewhat better. It's a little bit of extra work, but writing out the terms for the case of the extended permanent magnet would make the reference more complete.

Edit: On second thought, it is perhaps worth mentioning, but really not worth the trouble of displaying all the terms, since it is too lengthy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #11
But you can make your Insight easily complete by using your point-dipole model by calculating the equation of motion for that point dipole, falling through the pipe. See the quoted papers above.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
642
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K