How to Prove the Commutator Relations for Lorentz Lie Algebra?

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
So the generators of the Lorentz Lie algebra relations obey

[M^{\rho \sigma}, M^{\tau \mu}] = g^{\sigma \tau} M^{\rho \mu} - g^{\sigma \mu} M^{\rho \tau} + g^{\rho \mu} M^{\sigma \tau} - g^{\rho \tau} M^{\sigma \mu}

where (M^{\rho \sigma})^\mu{}_\nu = g^{\rho \mu} \delta^\sigma{}_\nu - g^{\sigma \mu} \delta^\rho{}_\nu

Now the commutator relation above will be satisfied for any representation of the LIe algebra since a representation of a Lie algebra is just a set of matrices such that the Lie bracket is given by the commutator.

So anyways, I was trying to prove this and just got totally bogged down in the algebra:

[M^{\rho \sigma}, M^{\tau \mu}] \\<br /> = (M^{\rho \sigma})^\lambda{}_\kappa ( M^{\tau \mu})^\kappa{}_\lambda - (M^{\tau \mu})^\lambda{}_\kappa (M^{\rho \sigma})^\kappa{}_\lambda \\<br /> =(g^{\rho \lambda} \delta^\sigma{}_\kappa - g^{\sigma \lambda} \delta^\rho{}_\kappa)(g^{\tau \kappa} \delta^\mu{}_\lambda - g^{\mu \kappa} \delta^\tau{}_\lambda) -(g^{\tau \lambda} \delta^\mu{}_\kappa - g^{\mu \lambda} \delta^\tau{}_\kappa)(g^{\rho \kappa} \delta^\sigma{}_\lambda - g^{\sigma \kappa} \delta^\rho{}_\lambda)

but expanding this out isn't going to give me any M terms like I need in the answer. Any ideas where I've messed up?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You shouldn't fully expand the commutator using the particular form of M, but only the first of the M's in the expanded commutator.
 
bigubau said:
You shouldn't fully expand the commutator using the particular form of M, but only the first of the M's in the expanded commutator.

ok. so i get to

g^{\rho \sigma} (M^{\tau \mu})^\sigma{}_\lambda - g^{\sigma \lambda} ( M^{\tau \mu})^\rho{}_\lambda - g^{\tau \lambda} ( M^{\rho \sigma})^\mu{}_\lambda + g^{\mu \lambda} ( M^{\rho \sigma})^\tau{}_\lambda

but don't know how to finish it off...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top