How to Prove the Limit of a Logarithmic Function Ratio?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jillna
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Limit
jillna
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Posted: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:49:50 Post subject: find a function from the limit
Suppose:

[late]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{log f_1(x)}{ log x } = c_1[/late]

and

[late]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{log f_2(x)}{ log x } = c_2[/late]

if [late]c_2>c_1[/late] then

[late]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{ log f_1(x) + f_2(x) ] }{ log x } = c_2 [/late]

can anyone tell me how to prove this rigorously?

tks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The general idea involves using the fact that fi(x) ~xci. Therefore f1(x)/f2(x) -> 0 as x ->∞. As a result the numerator in your last expression ends up behaving like logf2(x).

Good luck.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Back
Top