How to show the ground state is orthagnol with the first in a quantum harmonic os

leoflindall
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
How to show the ground state is orthagnol with the first in a quantum harmonic os...

Homework Statement



This is a revision question for an upcoming quantum mechanics exam, that i am stuck on. Any help or idea at how to approach the question would be greatly appreciated, i get the feeling it is quite easy and I am just missing something!

Harmonic Oscillator.

Show that the ground state is orthagonol to the first excited state wave function.

\psi_{0} (x) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{b\sqrt{\Pi}}} e ^{\frac{-x^{2}}{2b^{2}}}

\psi_{1} (x) = \sqrt{}\frac{2}{b^{3} \sqrt{\Pi}} e ^{\frac{-x^{2}}{2b^{2}}}


The Attempt at a Solution



I think that you have to work out the overlap by intergrating between the limits of +/- infinity of the complex conjugate of one wavefunction multiplied by the other. I don't get zero when i do this.

In this case is \psi_{1} (x) * = \psi_{1} (x) ?

Or is since the wave functions are in a harmonic osscilator that the limits of the intergral should be [0,L]?

Kind regards

Leo
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


You have the wrong equation for \psi^1. See http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hosc5.html#c1" for the correct wave functions. You should be integrating from -infinity to infinity though because the standard quantum harmonic oscillator doesn't have finite bounds on it. And yes, you should be integrating one function versus the Hermitian conjugate of the other.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top