How to solve a problem like this

  • Thread starter Thread starter gallimaufry
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of finding the unknown mass on one side of a balance, the key concept is torque. The moments on both sides of the balance must be equal for the system to be in equilibrium. The known variables include the mass of the object on the opposite side, the angle of the balance, and the distances from the fulcrum. The angle does not affect the torque calculation as long as the fulcrum point remains consistent. Understanding these principles will aid in accurately determining the unknown mass.
gallimaufry
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
How would you solve a problem like this. I am assuming its torque. You have to find the mass of the box on the left. Thanks for the help.
 

Attachments

  • 001.JPG
    001.JPG
    10.7 KB · Views: 357
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess it is a continuation, but i just wanted to draw out the problem. I am trying to solve for the unknown mass which is placed on one side of the balance. The things i know are the mass of the object on the other side, the angle the unbalanced balance is at, the distances the objects are from the fulcrum. If I posted incorrectly, forgive me it is my first time, and i will get better. Thanks for all the help
 
gallimaufry said:
How would you solve a problem like this. I am assuming its torque. You have to find the mass of the box on the left. Thanks for the help.

Hi gallimaufry! :smile:

Yes, it's torque (or moment) …

in equilibrium, the moment on each side must be the same

(but the angle makes no difference … the only reason why you have to get the scale arm horizontal when you're weighing is because you must use the same fulcrum point each time, and the fulcrum isn't a perfect point)
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Confused on whether this counts as an external torque
Replies
4
Views
1K
Torque on a pulley (2 masses connected by a string hanging from 2 pulleys)
Replies
17
Views
1K
How to Apply Derivatives in Physics Problems?
Replies
9
Views
1K
Tension Question for Ship Container and Wind Gust
Replies
12
Views
910
Correct approach in resolving a force into its different components
Replies
4
Views
1K
Help Me Solve This Khan Academy Question: Friction and Initial Velocity
Replies
5
Views
5K
Absolute motion analysis of pulley-spring system
Replies
10
Views
1K
How to set up this problem with driven torsional oscillator?
Replies
5
Views
860
Two ropes pulling on a cylinder that is translating and rotating on a plane
Replies
2
Views
738
The gravitating of a small mass towards a big mass
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top