How to solve an n-dimensional integral?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RoyGBiv12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
RoyGBiv12
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
How about start with a plot? Then get rid of that ugly looking integral, then just focus entirely on n=2 like that's all you got to do.

F_2(t)=\int_0^t\int_0^t f(\text{min}(x,y))dydx=\mathop\iint\limits_{\text{blue}} f(x)dydx+\mathop\iint\limits_{\text{red}} f(y)dydx

or is it the other way around? Need to check.
 

Attachments

  • myaxes.jpg
    myaxes.jpg
    6.1 KB · Views: 496
Hmmm, so you split it into two integrals to cover both cases (f(x) or f(y) being the min value). Are all four bounds still 0 to t? And how should I go about finding the antiderivative of that expression as was done in case n=1. Does this require Green's theorem?
 
RoyGBiv12 said:
Hmmm, so you split it into two integrals to cover both cases (f(x) or f(y) being the min value). Are all four bounds still 0 to t? And how should I go about finding the antiderivative of that expression as was done in case n=1. Does this require Green's theorem?

What do you think? Come up with something. Show some work. That's a requirement in this sub-forum. Then try and post what you think are the limits using Latex. That the language we use in here to make nice math symbols. See:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=546968

or just post them as text just to show you're trying. Or you can do a quote on my post to see how I coded the latex for that expression above. And I tell you what, suppose I have an integral function:

f(t)=\int_a^t g(x,t)dx

how would I find f'(t)? Leibniz right?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top