How to take the derivative of implicit functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the process of taking derivatives of implicit functions, specifically using the example of the equation x^2 + y^2 - 1 = 0. The key point is that when differentiating y with respect to x, the chain rule is applied, leading to the inclusion of dy/dx in the derivative of y^2. This is not merely an addition but a necessary component of the differentiation process, emphasizing the relationship between x and y. Participants express appreciation for the clarification and engage in light-hearted banter about the terminology used. Understanding the chain rule is crucial for correctly handling implicit differentiation.
Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
I have been able to follow how to take the derivative of implicit functions, such as:

x^2+y^2-1=0

Differentiating with respect to x

2x+2y\frac{dy}{dx}=0

\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{-x}{y}

Sure it's simple to follow, but I don't understand why the \frac{dy}{dx} is tacked onto the end of the differentiated variable y.

An explanation or article on the subject would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You're differentiating wrt x, so using the chain rule:

\frac{d}{dx}(y^2)=\frac{d}{dy}(y^2)\frac{dy}{dx}=2y\frac{dy}{dx}
 
Aha, so it's done using the chain rule. Thankyou :smile:
 
It's not "tacked on", it's nailed firmly!:-p
 
haha :smile:
I always think 2 moves ahead, taking into consideration that separating to isolate will be necessary. Nail vs tack, I think we know the winner :wink:
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top