How to use arc tan to find an angle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hasheesh786
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Arc Tan
AI Thread Summary
To find the angle between two displacements when not forming a right triangle, use the formula Arctan(Ry/Rx), where Ry and Rx are the y and x components of the vector. This formula calculates the angle the vector makes with the positive x-axis. The Arctan function provides a principal value between -90 and 90 degrees, which is essential to consider for accurate angle measurement. For the given displacements, you would need to determine the respective x and y components to apply the formula correctly. This method effectively allows for angle determination in vector analysis.
hasheesh786
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
in physics we were doing a problem that essentially involved vectors and in the end we were left with 2 displacements. how would i find the angle between them if it was not a right triangle? i asked someone and they said that i could find it using artan(Ry/Rx) ...R being one of the displacements
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If Ry and Rx are the y and x components of a vector, then there is a right angle between them- the x and y axes are at right angles. So, yes, Arctan(Ry/Rx) is the angle the vector makes with the positive x axis. (Since tangent is periodic, arctan is multivalued. Arctan is the "principal" value between -90 and 90 degrees. Make sure that is what you want.)
 
HallsofIvy said:
If Ry and Rx are the y and x components of a vector, then there is a right angle between them- the x and y axes are at right angles. So, yes, Arctan(Ry/Rx) is the angle the vector makes with the positive x axis. (Since tangent is periodic, arctan is multivalued. Arctan is the "principal" value between -90 and 90 degrees. Make sure that is what you want.)

so if the R value is 218.684158367 and the other displacement is 187 how would i find the angle between them using the arc tan?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top