How to write matrices as tensors

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohanL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Tensors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conversion of matrices to tensors, specifically addressing the equivalence of matrix equations and tensor notation. The first example confirms that the matrix addition of vectors corresponds to the tensor notation with indices. The second example raises questions about the correct representation of contravariant and covariant indices, with clarification that the expression can be correctly written using the appropriate tensor notation. Additionally, there is a discussion about the equivalence of a tensor expression and its matrix form, concluding that the tensor cannot be accurately represented in matrix form as initially suggested. Understanding the distinctions between contravariant and covariant vectors is emphasized throughout the conversation.
JohanL
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
I have some simple questions on how to write matrices as tensors.

1.
<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}a_1\\a_2\end{array}\right)+<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}b_1\\b_2\end{array}\right)=<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}c_1\\c_2\end{array}\right)<br />

is this equivalent to

A^j + B^j = C^j

with j = 1,2.

2.

<br /> 1/2\left(\begin{array}{cc}\dot{x}_1 &amp; \dot{x}_2\end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}3m &amp; m\\-m &amp; 3m\end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}\dot{x}_1 \\\dot{x}_2\end{array}\right)<br />

is this equivalent to

<br /> 1/2\dot{x}^{\mu}M_{\mu\nu}\dot{x}^{\nu}<br />

<br /> \mu,\nu=1,2<br />

and

<br /> M_{11}=3m,...,M_{22}=3m<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes,it's correct in the first case.In the second,u may put it

\frac{1}{2}\dot{x}_{\mu}M^{\mu}{}_{\nu} \dot{x}^{\nu}

Daniel.
 
thanks.

Is my 2 wrong?
Im struggling with the contravariant and covariant indicies.
is it because a row vector is a covariant vector and the column vector is a contravariant vector you write it like that...but that can't be right.


another question:
If you have an expression like

<br /> A^{ijk}B_k<br />

i,j,k = 1,2

this is equivalent to 4 expressions

<br /> A^{111}B_1 + A^{112}B_2<br />

<br /> A^{121}B_1 + A^{122}B_2<br />

<br /> A^{211}B_1 + A^{212}B_2<br />

<br /> A^{221}B_1 + A^{222}B_2<br />
 
Nope,it's just

A^{ij1}B_{1}+A^{ij2}B_{2}

,that is a second rank double contravariant tensor with 4 components,the ones you have written.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
ok...ty.

2 again.

if you have a tensor

1/2\dot{x}^{\mu}M_{\mu\nu}\dot{x}^{\nu}

\mu,\nu=1,2

M_{11}=3m,...,M_{22}=3m

and write it as a matrix you _dont_ get

1/2\left(\begin{array}{cc}\dot{x}_1 &amp; \dot{x}_2\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc}3m &amp; m\\-m &amp; 3m\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc}\dot{x}_1 \\\dot{x}_2\end{array}\right)

?
 
Nope.You can't put that expression in matrix form.

Daniel.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top