How would gravity act on an object with no velocity?

AI Thread Summary
An object dropped in a planet's gravitational field with no initial velocity will move straight toward the planet due to the gravitational force acting directly toward its center. It will not follow a circular pathway, as circular motion requires initial tangential velocity. The gravitational force is a net force that causes linear acceleration toward the planet. If the planet is rotating, the impact point will differ from the initial drop point, but this is due to the planet's rotation, not the object's motion. Ultimately, the object will fall directly toward the planet's surface.
safwan.hossain
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose there was a planet in deep space. Now drop an object in it's gravitational field. This object has no velocity whatsoever in any direction. Now, would this object start moving straight toward the planet (because that's the direction of net force) or follow a circular pathway (because gravity is a centripetal force). Please explain why?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My intuition tells me that this object would follow a circular pathway. But I have no way to rationalizing why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to revisit you circular motion physics - can you have a curved path without any initial tangential velocity?
 
I have no idea why your "intuition" would say such a thing! The gravitational force on an object acts directly toward the center of the planet. The same thing will happen to this object that would happen to a rock when you dropped it- it will move straight "down" toward the surface.

If the planet is rotating, the point at which the object hits the surface will not be the point that was directly beneath the object when it started falling but that is due to the rotation of the planet, not the motion of the object.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top